Tobacco Industry Influence on the American Law Institute's Restatements of Torts and Implications for Its Conflict of Interest Policies
The American Law Institute ("ALI") is a prestigious and influential organization that creates treatises on the current state of the law, including "Restatements" of case law that guide judicial decisions and legislation. This paper uses previously secret tobacco industry documents made available as the result of state and federal litigation against the industry to describe how the tobacco companies, acting both indirectly through their trade organization, the Tobacco Institute, and directly, using influential lawyers, quietly influenced the ALI's writing of the Restatements. The tobacco industry's ease of access to the ALI calls into question the Institute's independence, the preparation of major policy documents such as the Restatements, as well as the Institute's ability to monitor and control conflicts of interest. The ALI's conflict of interest policies lag behind comparable organizations such as the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine, and are insufficient to protect Institute projects from significant outside influence. Because of the undisclosed influence of the tobacco industry over the ALI, courts and legislatures should not apply the principles embodied in the Restatements in tort cases against the tobacco companies for injuries suffered from tobacco use. Until the ALI implements strong conflict of interest policies to ensure independence from private-interest manipulation, courts and legislatures should not rely on Institute reports and recommendations as neutral scholarly summaries of the law that should guide judicial and legislative decision-making.
The search for a cure: combating the problem of conflicts of interest that currently plagues biomedical research
Do you know who your physician is? Placing physician information on the Internet
Social risk and the transformation of public health law: lessons from the plague years
Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination
Circumcision and the American Academy of Pediatrics: should scientific misconduct result in trade association liability?
Intellectual property rights in genes and gene fragments: a registration solution for expressed sequence tags
The law of above averages: leveling the new genetic enhancement playing field
Reconceptualizing informed consent in an era of health care cost containment
HIV infection among women and children and antidiscrimination laws: an overview
Human immunodeficiency virus, the legal meaning of "handicap," and implications for public education under federal law at the dawn of the age of the ADA
The HIV-AIDS epidemic and the child welfare system: protecting the rights of infants, young children, and adolescents
AIDS and insurance: how private health coverage relates to HIV/AIDS infection and to public programs
To insure or not to insure persons infected with the virus that causes AIDS
Revising Iowa's Life-sustaining Procedures Act: creating a practical guide to living wills in Iowa
Just say no: birth control in the Connecticut Supreme Court before Griswold v. Connecticut
Litigation, legislation, and limelight: obstacles to commercial surrogate mother arrangements
Solomonic decisions in egg donation: unscrambling the conundrum of legal maternity
